GURCHARAN SINGH@KALA vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/8724/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010252452026

Filing Number

CRM-M/9329/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/8724/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Shalini Singh Nagpal

Coram

Ms. Justice Shalini Singh Nagpal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39.13 - ANTICIPATORY BAIL (AGNST WOMEN) ( 285 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURCHARAN SINGH@KALA

    Adv. P.K.S. PHOOLKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Ms. Justice Shalini Singh NagpalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana rejected Gurcharan Singh's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving alleged human trafficking and prostitution at Paris Hilton Hotel, Bathinda. Although the petitioner claimed he was not the hotel owner or present during the raid, the court found sufficient evidence of his complicity through victim statements indicating he procured girls for prostitution and profited from the arrangement. The court determined custodial interrogation was necessary for effective investigation and declined bail under Section 482 BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/8724/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana rejected Gurcharan Singh's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving alleged human trafficking and prostitution at Paris Hilton Hotel, Bathinda. Although the petitioner claimed he was not the hotel owner or present during the raid, the court found sufficient evidence of his complicity through victim statements indicating he procured girls for prostitution and profited from the arrangement. The court determined custodial interrogation was necessary for effective investigation and declined bail under Section 482 BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case