NARESH KUMAR JAIN vs STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND ORS — CWP/4978/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010248602026

e-Filing Number

11-02-2026

Filing Number

CWP/7297/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

CWP/4978/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri , Mrs. Justice Amarjot Bhatti

Coram

Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri , Mrs. Justice Amarjot Bhatti

Bench Type

Double

Category

76.1 - CASES RELATING TO STREET VENDORS/HAWKERS ( 806 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARESH KUMAR JAIN

    Adv. RANJEET KUMAR JASWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri,mrs. Justice Amarjot BhattiView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/4978/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Municipal Corporation Commissioner, Chandigarh, and the Estate Officer to jointly decide petitioner Naresh Kumar Jain's legal notice regarding transfer of Hand Cart Licence No. 1900 (dated 07.03.1991) as the legal heir of Roshan Lal Jain, and allotment of a built-up booth under applicable rules. Finding that responsibility was being shifted between state authorities, the court mandated a coordinated meeting between both officers to decide the matter in accordance with law, affording the petitioner a hearing opportunity, within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/4978/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/4978/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Municipal Corporation Commissioner, Chandigarh, and the Estate Officer to jointly decide petitioner Naresh Kumar Jain's legal notice regarding transfer of Hand Cart Licence No. 1900 (dated 07.03.1991) as the legal heir of Roshan Lal Jain, and allotment of a built-up booth under applicable rules. Finding that responsibility was being shifted between state authorities, the court mandated a coordinated meeting between both officers to decide the matter in accordance with law, affording the petitioner a hearing opportunity, within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case