BALJINDER SINGH AND ORS. DR. M.L. SACHDEVA vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. — CWP/17192/2001
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010247052001
Filing Number
CWP/17192/2001
Filing Date
29-Oct-2001
Registration No
CWP/17192/2001
Registration Date
29-Oct-2001
Judge
Mr. Justice Namit Kumar
Coram
Mr. Justice Namit Kumar
Bench Type
Single
Category
68.7 - SERVICE-EDU-PUNJAB(SECONDARY)(TGT) ( 796 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BALJINDER SINGH AND ORS. DR. M.L. SACHDEVA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
Mr. Justice Namit KumarView PDF
The petition challenging the public notice dated 20.10.2001 that determined merit-listing criteria for Lecturer positions in English and Punjabi—allegedly violating earlier court-approved criteria—was disposed of as infructuous due to the efflux of time. The court granted liberty to revive the petition if any surviving cause remained, with no substantive adjudication on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jul-2018
—
Mr. Justice Mahavir Singh Chauhan
-
07-May-2018
—
Mr. Justice S.P. Bangarh
-
08-Jan-2018
—
Mr. Justice S.P. Bangarh
-
11-Jul-2017
—
Mr. Justice Dr. Shekher Dhawan
-
09-Jan-2017
—
Mr. Justice S.P. Bangarh
-
04-Jul-2016
—
Mr. Justice S.P. Bangarh
-
05-Jan-2016
—
Mr. Justice A.B. Chaudhari
-
10-Aug-2015
—
Mr. Justice A.B. Chaudhari
-
02-Mar-2015
—
Mr. Justice Jaspal Singh
-
05-Jan-2015
—
Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri
-
25-Sep-2014
—
Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri
-
01-Aug-2014
—
Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri
-
30-Jun-2014
—
Mr. Justice T.H.B. Chalapathi
-
08-Jan-2014
—
Mr. Justice Ramendra Jain
-
01-Jul-2013
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Oct-2001
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/17192/2001
The petition challenging the public notice dated 20.10.2001 that determined merit-listing criteria for Lecturer positions in English and Punjabi—allegedly violating earlier court-approved criteria—was disposed of as infructuous due to the efflux of time. The court granted liberty to revive the petition if any surviving cause remained, with no substantive adjudication on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts