SUBHASH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. HARYANA — CRM-M/9940/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147, 149, 186, 323, 341, 353 IPC. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010246842024

Filing Number

CRM-M/14954/2024

Filing Date

21-Feb-2024

Registration No

CRM-M/9940/2024

Registration Date

22-Feb-2024

Judge

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Coram

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Bench Type

Single

Category

47 - CRIMINAL MISC.(DIRECTION) ( 215 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147, 149, 186, 323, 341, 353 IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBHASH

    Adv. SUKHVIR SINGH SAHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. HARYANA

  2. 2.DGP HARYANA

  3. 3.IGP

  4. 4.SP

  5. 5.SHO (Station House Officer)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh BediView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Subhash's petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking directions on FIR No.318 (registered for rioting, criminal intimidation, and assault at Police Station City Ratia, Fatehabad) after learning that a cancellation report had already been submitted and accepted by police on 24.10.2024 in the presence of the complainant. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to pursue available legal remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/9940/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Subhash's petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking directions on FIR No.318 (registered for rioting, criminal intimidation, and assault at Police Station City Ratia, Fatehabad) after learning that a cancellation report had already been submitted and accepted by police on 24.10.2024 in the presence of the complainant. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to pursue available legal remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case