BALJEET SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRA-D/239/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010244872026

Filing Number

CRA-D/8930/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRA-D/239/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara , Mrs. Justice Sukhvinder Kaur

Coram

Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara , Mrs. Justice Sukhvinder Kaur

Bench Type

Double

Category

17.81-CRIMINAL APPEAL UNDER NIA ACT,2019 SEEKING REGULAR BAILS-GENERAL ( 1423 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALJEET SINGH

    Adv. YAJUR SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara,mrs. Justice Sukhvinder KaurView PDF

    Case Summary The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Baljeet Singh's bail appeal in a grenade attack case on the Islamabad Police Station, Amritsar (December 2024). The court found prima facie evidence of his involvement in the terrorist attack, including disclosure statements, CCTV footage showing him on the motorcycle used to escape, and call details with international numbers linked to foreign handlers, establishing his active participation in the conspiracy. The court rejected all defense arguments and held that releasing him on bail would pose a threat to national security, though it directed expedited trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA-D/239/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Baljeet Singh's bail appeal in a grenade attack case on the Islamabad Police Station, Amritsar (December 2024). The court found prima facie evidence of his involvement in the terrorist attack, including disclosure statements, CCTV footage showing him on the motorcycle used to escape, and call details with international numbers linked to foreign handlers, establishing his active participation in the conspiracy. The court rejected all defense arguments and held that releasing him on bail would pose a threat to national security, though it directed expedited trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case