HARJASHAN DHILLON @ JASHANPREET SINGH @ JASHAN vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS — CRM-M/8391/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010237302026

Filing Number

CRM-M/8506/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/8391/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Coram

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Bench Type

Single

Category

47 - CRIMINAL MISC.(DIRECTION) ( 215 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARJASHAN DHILLON @ JASHANPREET SINGH @ JASHAN

    Adv. Deepinder Brar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Rupinderjit ChahalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/8391/2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed the petition of Harjashan Dhillon seeking 7 days prior notice before any FIR registration or arrest. The petitioner, already granted anticipatory bail in one FIR, feared vindictive prosecution following his father's (an MLA's) public statements criticizing government flood management. The court held that mandating prior notice would unlawfully obstruct investigative agency powers and grant blanket protection contrary to Supreme Court precedent, finding the petition devoid of merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/8391/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/8391/2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed the petition of Harjashan Dhillon seeking 7 days prior notice before any FIR registration or arrest. The petitioner, already granted anticipatory bail in one FIR, feared vindictive prosecution following his father's (an MLA's) public statements criticizing government flood management. The court held that mandating prior notice would unlawfully obstruct investigative agency powers and grant blanket protection contrary to Supreme Court precedent, finding the petition devoid of merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case