SOMBIR AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CRM-M/8315/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010235752026

Filing Number

CRM-M/8448/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/8315/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SOMBIR AND ANOTHER

    Adv. KOMAL BALAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petition by Sombir and another to quash FIR No. 245 (filed at Sonipat City for offenses under BNS sections 351(3), 3(5), 115, Arms Act Section 25, and Juvenile Justice Act Section 75) after the trial court verified a genuine compromise between all accused and complainants effected voluntarily and without coercion. Applying principles from Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Kulwinder Singh v. State of Punjab, the court quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings while binding the parties to the compromise terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/8315/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petition by Sombir and another to quash FIR No. 245 (filed at Sonipat City for offenses under BNS sections 351(3), 3(5), 115, Arms Act Section 25, and Juvenile Justice Act Section 75) after the trial court verified a genuine compromise between all accused and complainants effected voluntarily and without coercion. Applying principles from Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Kulwinder Singh v. State of Punjab, the court quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings while binding the parties to the compromise terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case