KRISHAN KUMAR vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CUM APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS — CWP/4121/2025

Case under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act Section Section 23. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-Feb-2025

CNR: PHHC010234532025

e-Filing Number

10-02-2025

Filing Number

CWP/8795/2025

Filing Date

11-Feb-2025

Registration No

CWP/4121/2025

Registration Date

11-Feb-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

Coram

Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.72 - MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS/SENIOR CITIZENS ( 764 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act Section Section 23
Constitution of India Section Article 226 and 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRISHAN KUMAR

    Adv. RAMESH GOYAT

  2. 2.Krishan Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CUM APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Krishan Kumar

  3. 3.Sub Divisional Magistrate cum Tribunal

  4. 4.Bani Singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Kuldeep TiwariView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside both the Deputy Commissioner's appellate order (28.11.2024) and the SDM's original order (06.02.2024) as void "coram non judice" because they violated the mandatory three-member tribunal composition prescribed by Haryana Government Notification 1041-SW(4)-2020. The court remanded the case for fresh decision by the complete tribunal comprising the SDM/DC as Chairman with two non-official members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/4121/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside both the Deputy Commissioner's appellate order (28.11.2024) and the SDM's original order (06.02.2024) as void "coram non judice" because they violated the mandatory three-member tribunal composition prescribed by Haryana Government Notification 1041-SW(4)-2020. The court remanded the case for fresh decision by the complete tribunal comprising the SDM/DC as Chairman with two non-official members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case