CHETAN JASSAL AND ANOTHER vs M/S GOPIKA INDUSTRIES AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/8373/2020
Case under No Acts Defined Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010234202020
Filing Number
CRM-M/12528/2020
Filing Date
18-02-2020
Registration No
CRM-M/8373/2020
Registration Date
25-02-2020
Judge
MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
Coram
MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
Bench Type
Single
Category
38.3 - PROCEEDING STAYED IN QUASHING ( 197 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
14th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHETAN JASSAL AND ANOTHER
Adv. AAYUSH GUPTA
YOGESH JASSAL
Respondent(s)
M/S GOPIKA INDUSTRIES AND ANOTHER
CHARAN DASS
Orders
Case Summary: CRM-M/8373/2020 The Punjab & Haryana High Court disposed of this petition after the parties settled their dispute through mediation. Petitioners Chetan Jassal and Yogesh Jassal had sought quashing of a cheque-bounce complaint (₹41,07,292) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, arguing they had no liability as the partnership firm M/s Sun Feeds was dissolved on 30.09.2018, and the cheque was issued by the subsequent sole proprietor, Pankaj Jha. The parties reached a settlement requiring the first party to pay ₹50 lakhs to M/s Gopika Industries in two instalments, with the complainant agreeing to withdraw the criminal complaint and related recovery suit. The court disposed of the petition as infructuous while directing that if the complaint is not withdrawn within three months, the petitioners may seek revival. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRM-M/8373/2020 The Punjab & Haryana High Court disposed of this petition after the parties settled their dispute through mediation. Petitioners Chetan Jassal and Yogesh Jassal had sought quashing of a cheque-bounce complaint (₹41,07,292) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, arguing they had no liability as the partnership firm M/s Sun Feeds was dissolved on 30.09.2018, and the cheque was issued by the subsequent sole proprietor, Pankaj Jha. The parties reached a settlement requiring the first party to pay ₹50 lakhs to M/s Gopika Industries in two instalments, with the complainant agreeing to withdraw the criminal complaint and related recovery suit. The court disposed of the petition as infructuous while directing that if the complaint is not withdrawn within three months, the petitioners may seek revival. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts