YASH PAL SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Advocate - A.G. HARYANA — CWP/5461/2021

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Mar-2021

CNR: PHHC010224352021

Filing Number

CWP/8680/2021

Filing Date

03-Mar-2021

Registration No

CWP/5461/2021

Registration Date

04-Mar-2021

Judge

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Coram

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Bench Type

Single

Category

20.12 - SCOSB (HARYANA) RETIRAL BENEFITS ( 454 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YASH PAL SINGH

    Adv. R S MANHAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Advocate - A.G. HARYANA

  2. 2.CHAIRMAN, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE HARYANA STATE WARE HOUSING CORPORATION

  3. 3.HARYANA STATE WARE HOUSING CORPORATION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh BrarView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/5461/2021 - Yash Pal Singh v. State of Haryana Decision (12.05.2026): The Punjab & Haryana High Court partially allowed the petition, directing refund of Rs.6,82,317/- recovered from the petitioner's retiral dues/gratuity with 6% annual interest within three months. The court found the appellate authority's rejection of the petitioner's appeal was arbitrary—a non-reasoned order violating natural justice principles—and discriminatory, as the principal delinquent co-accused (Ramesh Kumar) received penalty waiver despite substantiated charges, while the petitioner faced identical punishment despite allegations limited to alleged connivance and no direct misconduct findings by the inquiry officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Mar-2021

    Other

  4. 03-Mar-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/5461/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/5461/2021 - Yash Pal Singh v. State of Haryana Decision (12.05.2026): The Punjab & Haryana High Court partially allowed the petition, directing refund of Rs.6,82,317/- recovered from the petitioner's retiral dues/gratuity with 6% annual interest within three months. The court found the appellate authority's rejection of the petitioner's appeal was arbitrary—a non-reasoned order violating natural justice principles—and discriminatory, as the principal delinquent co-accused (Ramesh Kumar) received penalty waiver despite substantiated charges, while the petitioner faced identical punishment despite allegations limited to alleged connivance and no direct misconduct findings by the inquiry officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case