BALJIT SINGH AND OTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB — CRM-M/8844/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,326,148,149 IPC. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010221882024

Filing Number

CRM-M/13518/2024

Filing Date

16-Feb-2024

Registration No

CRM-M/8844/2024

Registration Date

16-Feb-2024

Judge

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Coram

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,326,148,149 IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALJIT SINGH AND OTHERS

    Adv. RAMANDEEP KAUR

  2. 2.GURDEV SINGH

  3. 3.SATNAM SINGH

  4. 4.BALWINDER KAUR

  5. 5.BHUPINDER KAUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB

  2. 2.VARINDER SINGH

  3. 3.JATINDER SINGH

  4. 4.KULDEEP KAUR

  5. 5.KASHMIR KAUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Ms. Justice Mandeep PannuView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana quashed FIR No. 46 dated 19.05.2021 and DDR No. 31 dated 20.05.2021 involving charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 326, 148, and 149, after the parties reached a genuine and voluntary compromise on 14.02.2024. The court found that continuation of proceedings served no useful purpose, would waste judicial time, and offered no prospect of conviction, thus exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/8844/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana quashed FIR No. 46 dated 19.05.2021 and DDR No. 31 dated 20.05.2021 involving charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 326, 148, and 149, after the parties reached a genuine and voluntary compromise on 14.02.2024. The court found that continuation of proceedings served no useful purpose, would waste judicial time, and offered no prospect of conviction, thus exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case