SIMRANJIT KAUR AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/7720/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
CNR: PHHC010221072026
Filing Number
CRM-M/7670/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/7720/2026
Registration Date
07-Feb-2026
Judge
Ms. Justice Aaradhna Sawhney
Coram
Ms. Justice Aaradhna Sawhney
Bench Type
Single
Category
39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 11-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SIMRANJIT KAUR AND ANOTHER
Adv. AMITOJ SINGH DHALIWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Ms. Justice Aaradhna SawhneyView PDF
The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed Simranjit Kaur and another's pre-arrest bail petition under Section 482 BNSS, confirming interim bail granted on 10.02.2026. The petitioners, accused under BNS sections including 118(1), 115(2), 126(2), 191(3), and 190, had minimal involvement (merely holding the complainant during the alleged assault), and the State conceded they had already joined investigation and were not needed for further custodial interrogation. The Court imposed standard bail conditions including cooperation with investigation, no tampering with evidence or witness intimidation, and prohibition on leaving the country without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/7720/2026
The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed Simranjit Kaur and another's pre-arrest bail petition under Section 482 BNSS, confirming interim bail granted on 10.02.2026. The petitioners, accused under BNS sections including 118(1), 115(2), 126(2), 191(3), and 190, had minimal involvement (merely holding the complainant during the alleged assault), and the State conceded they had already joined investigation and were not needed for further custodial interrogation. The Court imposed standard bail conditions including cooperation with investigation, no tampering with evidence or witness intimidation, and prohibition on leaving the country without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts