RAJDEEP KAUR vs SUNNY KUMAR — TA/186/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 29-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010215082026

e-Filing Number

04-02-2026

Filing Number

TA/5957/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

TA/186/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Coram

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

35 - TRANSFERS ( 565 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJDEEP KAUR

    Adv. HARDIK AHLUWALIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUNNY KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: TA/186/2026 - Rajdeep Kaur v. Sunny Kumar The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Rajdeep Kaur's transfer application, shifting her husband's divorce petition (filed under Hindu Marriage Act Sections 12(2)(a)(i) and 13) from Fatehgarh Sahib Family Court to Ludhiana. The court prioritized the wife's convenience, considering her unemployment, financial dependence on elderly parents, custody of a 3-year-old child, lack of male family support for court travel, and the 64-kilometer distance between her residence and the original court. The court directed mediation attempts and ordered monthly hearing accommodations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TA/186/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TA/186/2026 - Rajdeep Kaur v. Sunny Kumar The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Rajdeep Kaur's transfer application, shifting her husband's divorce petition (filed under Hindu Marriage Act Sections 12(2)(a)(i) and 13) from Fatehgarh Sahib Family Court to Ludhiana. The court prioritized the wife's convenience, considering her unemployment, financial dependence on elderly parents, custody of a 3-year-old child, lack of male family support for court travel, and the 64-kilometer distance between her residence and the original court. The court directed mediation attempts and ordered monthly hearing accommodations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case