SUNITA AND ORS vs UTTRI HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND ANR Advocate - A.G. HARYANA — CWP/3601/2024

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 19-Feb-2024

CNR: PHHC010204962024

Filing Number

CWP/7946/2024

Filing Date

13-Feb-2024

Registration No

CWP/3601/2024

Registration Date

15-Feb-2024

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.63 - CASES RELATING TO ALL KINDS OF COMPENSATION ( 756 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNITA AND ORS

    Adv. RAJESH GOYAL

  2. 2.IMRAN

  3. 3.IMRANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UTTRI HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND ANR Advocate - A.G. HARYANA

  2. 2.UHBVN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    Summary of CWP/3601/2024 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petition, directing UHBVN to recalculate compensation from Rs. 12,00,875 to Rs. 14,41,050 using proper methodology under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (instead of outdated 2017-18 Income Tax Returns) and pay the differential within four weeks. The court also ordered payment of 12% interest from the application filing date, rejecting UHBVN's objection to pre-application interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Feb-2024

    Other

  4. 13-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3601/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CWP/3601/2024 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petition, directing UHBVN to recalculate compensation from Rs. 12,00,875 to Rs. 14,41,050 using proper methodology under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (instead of outdated 2017-18 Income Tax Returns) and pay the differential within four weeks. The court also ordered payment of 12% interest from the application filing date, rejecting UHBVN's objection to pre-application interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case