RAMDHARI vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/7008/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010202832026

Filing Number

CRM-M/6780/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/7008/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMDHARI

    Adv. AMIT CHOUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    Summary of CRM-M/7008/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted Ramdhari anticipatory bail in an FIR alleging misappropriation and cheating related to crop insurance scheme implementation at an agricultural cooperative society. The court found the allegations primarily involved procedural irregularities and accounting discrepancies rather than clear criminal intent, noting that beneficiaries stated they received their dues and custodial interrogation was unnecessary since evidence was documentary and already in institutional custody. Bail was granted subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/7008/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRM-M/7008/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted Ramdhari anticipatory bail in an FIR alleging misappropriation and cheating related to crop insurance scheme implementation at an agricultural cooperative society. The court found the allegations primarily involved procedural irregularities and accounting discrepancies rather than clear criminal intent, noting that beneficiaries stated they received their dues and custodial interrogation was unnecessary since evidence was documentary and already in institutional custody. Bail was granted subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case