ANARO DEVI ALIAS ANARO vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/3424/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-Feb-2026

CNR: PHHC010199442026

e-Filing Number

03-02-2026

Filing Number

CWP/5313/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

CWP/3424/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Bench Type

Single

Category

18.11 - LAND LAWS S.B. ( 448 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANARO DEVI ALIAS ANARO

    Adv. SURESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Smt. Anaro Devi's writ petition challenging land partition orders in Gurugram district. The petitioner sought a 5-Karam wide passage instead of the approved 2-Karam passage, arguing the land fell in a residential zone requiring larger access. The court upheld the lower authorities' decisions, finding no merit in the petitioner's demand since no other co-sharers objected to the 2-Karam passage and historical consolidation records showed only 1-Karam passages existed, concluding the petitioner raised the objection with oblique motives to harass other parties and prolong litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3424/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Smt. Anaro Devi's writ petition challenging land partition orders in Gurugram district. The petitioner sought a 5-Karam wide passage instead of the approved 2-Karam passage, arguing the land fell in a residential zone requiring larger access. The court upheld the lower authorities' decisions, finding no merit in the petitioner's demand since no other co-sharers objected to the 2-Karam passage and historical consolidation records showed only 1-Karam passages existed, concluding the petitioner raised the objection with oblique motives to harass other parties and prolong litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case