KULWINDER KAUR vs HARGOPAL SINGH — TA/161/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010197512026

e-Filing Number

02-02-2026

Filing Number

TA/5219/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

TA/161/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Coram

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

35 - TRANSFERS ( 565 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KULWINDER KAUR

    Adv. VIVEK K. THAKUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARGOPAL SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: TA/161/2026 Kulwinder Kaur v. Hargopal Singh (High Court of Punjab and Haryana, 14.05.2026) The High Court allowed Kulwinder Kaur's petition to transfer her husband's matrimonial case from the Family Court at Dasuya to a competent court at Kapurthala. The court found sufficient grounds for transfer based on the petitioner's economic hardship (no income), single-handed custody of two minor children, 70-kilometer distance making frequent travel burdensome, and a pending domestic violence case before a different court. Applying Supreme Court precedent prioritizing the wife's convenience in matrimonial matters, the court ordered case transfer with directions for mediation attempts and monthly hearing dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TA/161/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TA/161/2026 Kulwinder Kaur v. Hargopal Singh (High Court of Punjab and Haryana, 14.05.2026) The High Court allowed Kulwinder Kaur's petition to transfer her husband's matrimonial case from the Family Court at Dasuya to a competent court at Kapurthala. The court found sufficient grounds for transfer based on the petitioner's economic hardship (no income), single-handed custody of two minor children, 70-kilometer distance making frequent travel burdensome, and a pending domestic violence case before a different court. Applying Supreme Court precedent prioritizing the wife's convenience in matrimonial matters, the court ordered case transfer with directions for mediation attempts and monthly hearing dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case