KRISHAN vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/6512/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 26-Feb-2026

CNR: PHHC010191682026

Filing Number

CRM-M/6242/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/6512/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Bench Type

Single

Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRISHAN

    Adv. BALJEET BENIWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/6512/2026 Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Krishan's petition for anticipatory bail in an NDPS Act case involving alleged trafficking of pharmaceutical injections (Buprenorphine, Diazepam, and Avil). Justice Sumeet Goel found a prima facie case against the petitioner based on a chain of disclosure statements linking him as the source of contraband, coupled with his admitted receipt of Rs. 13.89 lakh via UPI from co-accused Shahrukh, which evidenced common intention and joint participation in criminal conspiracy. The court determined that custodial interrogation was essential to unravel the alleged narcotics network, trace the contraband's origin, and identify other conspirators. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/6512/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/6512/2026 Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Krishan's petition for anticipatory bail in an NDPS Act case involving alleged trafficking of pharmaceutical injections (Buprenorphine, Diazepam, and Avil). Justice Sumeet Goel found a prima facie case against the petitioner based on a chain of disclosure statements linking him as the source of contraband, coupled with his admitted receipt of Rs. 13.89 lakh via UPI from co-accused Shahrukh, which evidenced common intention and joint participation in criminal conspiracy. The court determined that custodial interrogation was essential to unravel the alleged narcotics network, trace the contraband's origin, and identify other conspirators. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case