O&M JAGIR SINGH vs GURDIP SINGH — FAO/5228/2002

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 19-Jan-2012

CNR: PHHC010185542002

Filing Number

FAO/5228/2002

Filing Date

28-Oct-2002

Registration No

FAO/5228/2002

Registration Date

28-Oct-2002

Judge

Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal

Coram

Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal

Bench Type

Single

Category

500.1 - NEW INDIA ASSURANCE ( 876 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.O&M JAGIR SINGH

    Adv. R.S.MAMLI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GURDIP SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Virinder AggarwalView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed FAO 5228/2002 (Jagir Singh v. Gurdip Singh) for want of prosecution on 24.03.2026. Despite multiple notices and adjournments since July 2025, neither party appeared before the court, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the appeal. The court ruled that keeping the long-pending matter (from 2002) on the docket indefinitely would serve no useful purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Jan-2019

    —

    Mrs. Justice Archana Puri

  4. 30-Oct-2018

    —

    Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal

  5. 10-Oct-2018

    —

    Mrs Justice Daya Chaudhary

  6. 02-Jul-2018

    —

    Mrs Justice Daya Chaudhary

  7. 07-Sep-2016

    Mr. Justice Amit Rawal

  8. 23-Jan-2014

    Mrs. Justice Archana PuriView PDF

  9. 08-Jan-2014

    —

    Mr. Justice Sharan Jeet Singh Grewal

  10. 19-Jan-2012

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 28-Oct-2002

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/5228/2002

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed FAO 5228/2002 (Jagir Singh v. Gurdip Singh) for want of prosecution on 24.03.2026. Despite multiple notices and adjournments since July 2025, neither party appeared before the court, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the appeal. The court ruled that keeping the long-pending matter (from 2002) on the docket indefinitely would serve no useful purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case