UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS vs JASPAL KAUR GREWAL AND ANOTHER — CWP/4033/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010177422026

e-Filing Number

31-01-2026

Filing Number

CWP/4408/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

CWP/4033/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda

Bench Type

Double

Category

4.11 - ORDERS AGAINST ARMED FORCE TRIBUNAL(CIVIL) ( 328 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

    Adv. NEHA JAGGI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JASPAL KAUR GREWAL AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,mr. Justice Deepak ManchandaView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting family pension to Jaspal Kaur Grewal (widow of Jasbir Inder Pal Singh Grewal) after condoning a 13-month 12-day service shortfall. The court held that the issue was already decided by the Supreme Court in Balakrishnan Mullikote's case (decided March 24, 2026), which granted similar relief to soldiers with comparable service records, and therefore the challenge could not be entertained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/4033/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting family pension to Jaspal Kaur Grewal (widow of Jasbir Inder Pal Singh Grewal) after condoning a 13-month 12-day service shortfall. The court held that the issue was already decided by the Supreme Court in Balakrishnan Mullikote's case (decided March 24, 2026), which granted similar relief to soldiers with comparable service records, and therefore the challenge could not be entertained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case