BALWANT SINGH JAYANI vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS — CWP/12722/2000
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010176772000
Filing Number
CWP/12722/2000
Filing Date
18-Sep-2000
Registration No
CWP/12722/2000
Registration Date
18-Sep-2000
Judge
Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger
Coram
Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger
Bench Type
Single
Category
18.11 - LAND LAWS S.B. ( 448 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BALWANT SINGH JAYANI
Adv. MANSUR ALI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the writ petition (CWP-12722-2000) filed by Balwant Singh Jayani for non-prosecution on 13.05.2026. The petitioner had sought to quash proceedings under the Punjab Public Premises (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1973, but despite the original petitioner's death and the court's prior adjournment to 24.02.2026 for filing necessary documents, no appearance was made on the subsequent hearing date and no application to implead legal representatives or vakalatnama was filed. Justice Harsh Bunger therefore dismissed the petition due to lack of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Sep-2000
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/12722/2000
Summary: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the writ petition (CWP-12722-2000) filed by Balwant Singh Jayani for non-prosecution on 13.05.2026. The petitioner had sought to quash proceedings under the Punjab Public Premises (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1973, but despite the original petitioner's death and the court's prior adjournment to 24.02.2026 for filing necessary documents, no appearance was made on the subsequent hearing date and no application to implead legal representatives or vakalatnama was filed. Justice Harsh Bunger therefore dismissed the petition due to lack of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts