SUKHVINDER SINGH ALIAS SUKHA BOUNCER vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/5589/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
CNR: PHHC010169252026
Filing Number
CRM-M/5104/2026
Filing Date
30-Jan-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/5589/2026
Registration Date
30-Jan-2026
Judge
Ms. Justice Aaradhna Sawhney
Coram
Ms. Justice Aaradhna Sawhney
Bench Type
Single
Category
39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 11-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUKHVINDER SINGH ALIAS SUKHA BOUNCER
Adv. DHIRAJ JINDAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Ms. Justice Aaradhna SawhneyView PDF
Case Summary: CRM-M-5589/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted pre-arrest bail to Sukhvinder Singh (Sukha Bouncer), an accused in FIR No. 139 for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 190, and 191(3) BNS. The court confirmed interim bail granted on 31.01.2026, considering that the petitioner had joined investigation, possessed clean antecedents, and was charged with causing a simple injury with an iron rod. The bail was granted subject to conditions including appearing before the Investigating Officer as required, not tampering with evidence, not influencing witnesses, and not leaving the country without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/5589/2026
Case Summary: CRM-M-5589/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted pre-arrest bail to Sukhvinder Singh (Sukha Bouncer), an accused in FIR No. 139 for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 190, and 191(3) BNS. The court confirmed interim bail granted on 31.01.2026, considering that the petitioner had joined investigation, possessed clean antecedents, and was charged with causing a simple injury with an iron rod. The bail was granted subject to conditions including appearing before the Investigating Officer as required, not tampering with evidence, not influencing witnesses, and not leaving the country without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts