AANAND KUMAR @ SARDAR vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/5732/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 25-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010160332026

Filing Number

CRM-M/4645/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/5732/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Coram

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Bench Type

Single

Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AANAND KUMAR @ SARDAR

    Adv. MOHAN SINGH RANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Ms. Justice Rupinderjit ChahalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/5732/2026 Decision: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to Aanand Kumar @ Sardar in a case involving alleged misuse of Aadhaar Card and Driving Licence to fraudulently procure employment for document fraud and misappropriation of Amazon goods worth Rs. 44 lakhs. Key Reasoning: Justice Rupinderjit Chahal held that the petitioner's 5+ months custody without trial commencement violates Article 21 rights. The court noted the petitioner was implicated solely on co-accused disclosure statements (inadmissible evidence), has clean antecedents, and prolonged detention serves no useful purpose when trial timeline is uncertain. The court applied the principle "bail is a rule, jail is an exception." Condition: Release on furnishing bail and surety bonds to the trial court's satisfaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/5732/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/5732/2026 Decision: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to Aanand Kumar @ Sardar in a case involving alleged misuse of Aadhaar Card and Driving Licence to fraudulently procure employment for document fraud and misappropriation of Amazon goods worth Rs. 44 lakhs. Key Reasoning: Justice Rupinderjit Chahal held that the petitioner's 5+ months custody without trial commencement violates Article 21 rights. The court noted the petitioner was implicated solely on co-accused disclosure statements (inadmissible evidence), has clean antecedents, and prolonged detention serves no useful purpose when trial timeline is uncertain. The court applied the principle "bail is a rule, jail is an exception." Condition: Release on furnishing bail and surety bonds to the trial court's satisfaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case