SURINDER SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CRA-S/405/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010152922026

Filing Number

CRA-S/4342/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRA-S/405/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Bench Type

Single

Category

36.37-CRIMINAL APPEALS U/S 14A UNDER SC/ST ACT,1989 SEEKING ANTICIPATORY BAILS-GENERAL ( 1424 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURINDER SINGH

    Adv. AMINDER SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    Summary: CRA-S-405-2026 (Surinder Singh v. State of Punjab) The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Surinder Singh's appeal against the lower court's rejection of his anticipatory bail application. Singh was accused in an FIR arising from a village-level political dispute involving an armed assault. The court noted Singh had no specific role attributed to him, SC/ST Act charges were added 11 days later without caste-based language evidence, and custodial interrogation was no longer required after he joined investigation on 29.04.2026. Bail was granted subject to conditions including passport surrender and continued cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA-S/405/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: CRA-S-405-2026 (Surinder Singh v. State of Punjab) The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Surinder Singh's appeal against the lower court's rejection of his anticipatory bail application. Singh was accused in an FIR arising from a village-level political dispute involving an armed assault. The court noted Singh had no specific role attributed to him, SC/ST Act charges were added 11 days later without caste-based language evidence, and custodial interrogation was no longer required after he joined investigation on 29.04.2026. Bail was granted subject to conditions including passport surrender and continued cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case