SINTU KUMAR ALIAS KALA vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/5475/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010151082026

Filing Number

CRM-M/4197/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/5475/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SINTU KUMAR ALIAS KALA

    Adv. ASHISH GREWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to Sintu Kumar in a NDPS Act case involving possession of commercial quantity of narcotics. The court held that his prolonged incarceration for 1 year, 7 months and 17 days, combined with slow trial progress (only 4 of 26 prosecution witnesses examined), constitutes sufficient grounds for bail despite the gravity of charges, invoking Supreme Court precedents that prolonged detention violates Article 21 rights and that constitutional principles override Section 37 NDPS Act restrictions when trials are unreasonably delayed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/5475/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to Sintu Kumar in a NDPS Act case involving possession of commercial quantity of narcotics. The court held that his prolonged incarceration for 1 year, 7 months and 17 days, combined with slow trial progress (only 4 of 26 prosecution witnesses examined), constitutes sufficient grounds for bail despite the gravity of charges, invoking Supreme Court precedents that prolonged detention violates Article 21 rights and that constitutional principles override Section 37 NDPS Act restrictions when trials are unreasonably delayed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case