PAMMI AND OTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/5806/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010150212026

Filing Number

CRM-M/4168/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/5806/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAMMI AND OTHERS

    Adv. JAGAN NATH BHANDARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petition and quashed FIR No.7 dated 22.01.2019 filed at Police Station Naya Gaon, SAS Nagar Mohali, against petitioners Pammi and Others for offences under IPC Sections 341, 323, 506, 34 (with later additions of Sections 325, 148, 149, 201). The court found that the parties had voluntarily settled their dispute through a genuine compromise verified by the trial magistrate's report, and continuing proceedings served no useful purpose. The petitioners were ordered to deposit Rs.20,000 towards costs with the High Court Legal Services Committee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/5806/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petition and quashed FIR No.7 dated 22.01.2019 filed at Police Station Naya Gaon, SAS Nagar Mohali, against petitioners Pammi and Others for offences under IPC Sections 341, 323, 506, 34 (with later additions of Sections 325, 148, 149, 201). The court found that the parties had voluntarily settled their dispute through a genuine compromise verified by the trial magistrate's report, and continuing proceedings served no useful purpose. The petitioners were ordered to deposit Rs.20,000 towards costs with the High Court Legal Services Committee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case