JASWANT SINGH ALIAS JASSA vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/5466/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010149172026

Filing Number

CRM-M/4123/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/5466/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JASWANT SINGH ALIAS JASSA

    Adv. RAHUL BHARGAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/5466/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Jaswant Singh's second bail petition in a murder case where he is accused of instigating a co-accused to shoot the victim under BNS Sections 103(1), 190, 191(3) and Arms Act Sections 25/27. Justice Manisha Batra held that prolonged custody alone cannot justify bail in heinous crimes, and the petitioner's alleged active participation—including arranging the victim's presence and exhorting the co-accused to use the firearm—constitutes serious allegations warranting continued detention pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/5466/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/5466/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Jaswant Singh's second bail petition in a murder case where he is accused of instigating a co-accused to shoot the victim under BNS Sections 103(1), 190, 191(3) and Arms Act Sections 25/27. Justice Manisha Batra held that prolonged custody alone cannot justify bail in heinous crimes, and the petitioner's alleged active participation—including arranging the victim's presence and exhorting the co-accused to use the firearm—constitutes serious allegations warranting continued detention pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case