SATNAM CHAND vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRA-S/2158/2003
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 12th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010147672003
Filing Number
CRA-S/2158/2003
Filing Date
22-Nov-2003
Registration No
CRA-S/2158/2003
Registration Date
22-Nov-2003
Judge
Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat
Coram
Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat
Bench Type
Single
Category
36.77 - CRL APPL AGNST CONV GEN MORE THAN 3 UPTO 5 YEARS ( 600 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
12-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SATNAM CHAND
Adv. R K GIRDHAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-May-2026
Mr. Justice N.S. ShekhawatView PDF
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana upheld Satnam Chand's conviction for attempted murder (Section 307 IPC) and illegal firearm use (Section 27 Arms Act) arising from a 2001 shooting incident where he shot his uncle Kharait Lal during a water dispute, causing severe hand injuries requiring amputation. However, the court reduced his sentence to time already served (1 year 4 months 30 days) given the 24+ year delay since FIR registration and his good conduct during suspension, while enhancing the fine to ₹1,00,000 as compensation to the injured party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jan-2016
—
Mr. Justice S.J. Vazifdar
-
18-Nov-2015
Mrs. Justice Anita Chaudhry
-
10-Aug-2015
—
Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj
-
02-Mar-2015
—
Mrs Justice Daya Chaudhary
-
05-Jan-2015
—
Mrs Justice Daya Chaudhary
-
25-Sep-2014
—
Mrs Justice Daya Chaudhary
-
01-Aug-2014
—
Mr. Justice Gurvinder Singh Gill
-
30-Jun-2014
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Nov-2003
Case filed
Registration No. CRA-S/2158/2003
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana upheld Satnam Chand's conviction for attempted murder (Section 307 IPC) and illegal firearm use (Section 27 Arms Act) arising from a 2001 shooting incident where he shot his uncle Kharait Lal during a water dispute, causing severe hand injuries requiring amputation. However, the court reduced his sentence to time already served (1 year 4 months 30 days) given the 24+ year delay since FIR registration and his good conduct during suspension, while enhancing the fine to ₹1,00,000 as compensation to the injured party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts