GAURAV PARKASH vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRA-S/369/2005
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 12th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010142942005
Filing Number
CRA-S/369/2005
Filing Date
21-Feb-2005
Registration No
CRA-S/369/2005
Registration Date
21-Feb-2005
Judge
Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat
Coram
Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat
Bench Type
Single
Category
36 - CRIMINAL APPEALS ( 142 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
12-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GAURAV PARKASH
Adv. RAKESH NEHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-May-2026
Mr. Justice N.S. ShekhawatView PDF
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana upheld Gaurav Parkash's conviction under Section 25/54/59 of the Arms Act for illegally possessing a countrymade pistol, but reduced his sentence from one year rigorous imprisonment to time already served (approximately 3 months), while retaining the Rs. 500 fine. The court considered that Parkash had been a first-time offender facing trial for over 22 years with good conduct during suspension, warranting leniency on sentencing while maintaining the conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Oct-2018
—
Mrs. Justice Archana Puri
-
02-Jul-2018
—
Mr. Justice Karamjit Singh
-
07-May-2018
—
Mr. Justice Harminder Singh Madaan
-
08-Jan-2018
—
Mr. Justice Tejinder Singh Dhindsa
-
11-Jul-2017
—
Mr. Justice Harminder Singh Madaan
-
03-Jul-2017
—
Mr. Justice Harminder Singh Madaan
-
09-Jan-2017
—
Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Verma
-
04-Jul-2016
—
Mr. Justice Dr. Shekher Dhawan
-
22-Feb-2005
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2005
Case filed
Registration No. CRA-S/369/2005
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana upheld Gaurav Parkash's conviction under Section 25/54/59 of the Arms Act for illegally possessing a countrymade pistol, but reduced his sentence from one year rigorous imprisonment to time already served (approximately 3 months), while retaining the Rs. 500 fine. The court considered that Parkash had been a first-time offender facing trial for over 22 years with good conduct during suspension, warranting leniency on sentencing while maintaining the conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts