RAJU vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRA-S/273/2005

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Feb-2005

CNR: PHHC010141932005

Filing Number

CRA-S/273/2005

Filing Date

08-Feb-2005

Registration No

CRA-S/273/2005

Registration Date

08-Feb-2005

Judge

Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat

Coram

Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat

Bench Type

Single

Category

36.71 - CRL APPL AGNST CONVICTION GEN UPTO 3 YEARS ( 595 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJU

    Adv. NARENDER HOODA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice N.S. ShekhawatView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana upheld the conviction of appellants Raj @ Rijwan and Rajesh under Section 25 of the Arms Act, finding the prosecution successfully proved they possessed illegal firearms during a planned dacoity on a petrol pump. However, the court reduced their sentences to the period already undergone (over 2 months custody) while maintaining the fine, citing the 23-year trial/appeal duration, their acquittal in related cases, and maintained good conduct since suspension of their earlier sentences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Oct-2018

    Mrs. Justice Archana Puri

  4. 02-Jul-2018

    Mr. Justice Tejinder Singh Dhindsa

  5. 07-May-2018

    Mr. Justice Arun Palli

  6. 08-Jan-2018

    Mr. Justice Arun Palli

  7. 11-Jul-2017

    Lok Adalat Bench - 2

  8. 03-Jul-2017

    Mr. Justice Mahavir Singh Chauhan

  9. 09-Jan-2017

    Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Verma

  10. 04-Jul-2016

    Mr. Justice Dr. Shekher Dhawan

  11. 10-Feb-2005

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 08-Feb-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA-S/273/2005

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana upheld the conviction of appellants Raj @ Rijwan and Rajesh under Section 25 of the Arms Act, finding the prosecution successfully proved they possessed illegal firearms during a planned dacoity on a petrol pump. However, the court reduced their sentences to the period already undergone (over 2 months custody) while maintaining the fine, citing the 23-year trial/appeal duration, their acquittal in related cases, and maintained good conduct since suspension of their earlier sentences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case