GURDEV vs SANJEEV KUMAR — CRR(F)/94/2017

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010138022017

Filing Number

CRR(F)/94/2017

Filing Date

02-Aug-2017

Registration No

CRR(F)/94/2017

Registration Date

02-Aug-2017

Judge

Mrs. Justice Sukhvinder Kaur

Coram

Mrs. Justice Sukhvinder Kaur

Category

1.45 - LPA-SERVICE CORPO.& OTHER STATUT.BODIES (U.T./UOI) ( 350 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURDEV

    Adv. MUNISH MITTAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANJEEV KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mrs. Justice Sukhvinder KaurView PDF

    Case Summary: Gurdev v. Sanjeev Kumar (CRR(F)/94/2017) The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed that Gurdev's appeal against acquittal in a cheque dishonor case (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act) be treated as filed under Section 372 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Sessions Court, rather than requiring special leave under Section 378(4). Following the Supreme Court's M/s. Celestium Financial judgment, the court recognized that victims in private complaint cases have an unconditional right to appeal acquittals, placing them on par with accused persons' appeal rights, without procedural barriers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Aug-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR(F)/94/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Gurdev v. Sanjeev Kumar (CRR(F)/94/2017) The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed that Gurdev's appeal against acquittal in a cheque dishonor case (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act) be treated as filed under Section 372 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Sessions Court, rather than requiring special leave under Section 378(4). Following the Supreme Court's M/s. Celestium Financial judgment, the court recognized that victims in private complaint cases have an unconditional right to appeal acquittals, placing them on par with accused persons' appeal rights, without procedural barriers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case