DAVINDER SINGH AND OTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/5450/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010131312026

Filing Number

CRM-M/3227/2026

Filing Date

23-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/5450/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DAVINDER SINGH AND OTHERS

    Adv. VIKAS SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petition to quash FIR No.50 (dated 20.04.2021) against Davinder Singh and others, filed under Sections 295 and 34 IPC at Police Station Mukerian, District Hoshiarpur, based on a voluntary compromise between the parties dated 22.01.2026. The Magistrate's report confirmed the compromise was genuine and without coercion, and the State and complainant did not dispute the settlement. The court found no useful purpose in continuing trial proceedings and quashed the FIR following established legal principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/5450/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petition to quash FIR No.50 (dated 20.04.2021) against Davinder Singh and others, filed under Sections 295 and 34 IPC at Police Station Mukerian, District Hoshiarpur, based on a voluntary compromise between the parties dated 22.01.2026. The Magistrate's report confirmed the compromise was genuine and without coercion, and the State and complainant did not dispute the settlement. The court found no useful purpose in continuing trial proceedings and quashed the FIR following established legal principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case