SARABJIT KAUR vs SWARAN KAUR DECEASED THR. LRS — CR/1237/2023

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010130422023

Filing Number

CR/4955/2023

Filing Date

30-Jan-2023

Registration No

CR/1237/2023

Registration Date

22-Feb-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikram Aggarwal

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikram Aggarwal

Bench Type

Single

Category

30.1 - CIVIL REVISION(I.O. AND OTHERS) ( 504 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SARABJIT KAUR

    Adv. N.S. DIWANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SWARAN KAUR DECEASED THR. LRS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikram AggarwalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside the trial court's order allowing Jaswinder Kaur's impleadment as legal representative of deceased plaintiff Swaran Kaur, finding it violated procedural requirements under Order 22 Rule 5 CPC. The court held that when a dispute exists about who qualifies as a legal representative (especially involving a will), the court must conduct a formal limited enquiry with evidence before allowing impleadment, rather than allowing it summarily. The case was remitted to the trial court to follow proper procedure in determining Swaran Kaur's actual legal representative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/1237/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside the trial court's order allowing Jaswinder Kaur's impleadment as legal representative of deceased plaintiff Swaran Kaur, finding it violated procedural requirements under Order 22 Rule 5 CPC. The court held that when a dispute exists about who qualifies as a legal representative (especially involving a will), the court must conduct a formal limited enquiry with evidence before allowing impleadment, rather than allowing it summarily. The case was remitted to the trial court to follow proper procedure in determining Swaran Kaur's actual legal representative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case