RAGHUBIR SINGH vs MOHINDER SINGH AND ORS — CRA-AS/166/2018

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010129552018

Filing Number

CRA-AS/166/2018

Filing Date

05-Dec-2018

Registration No

CRA-AS/166/2018

Registration Date

05-Dec-2018

Judge

Mrs. Justice Sukhvinder Kaur

Coram

Mrs. Justice Sukhvinder Kaur

Category

14.21 - FAMILY COURT-APPL AGNST PETITION U/S 9 OF HMA ( 417 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAGHUBIR SINGH

    Adv. BY ORDER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHINDER SINGH AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Justice Sukhvinder KaurView PDF

    Summary: The Punjab and Haryana High Court redirected an appeal against acquittal by complainant Raghubir Singh to the Sessions Court for disposal under Section 372 of the CrPC, following the Supreme Court's landmark ruling in *M/s. Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran*. The court held that victims/complainants in private complaint cases have an unconditional right to appeal acquittals before the Sessions Court, without requiring special leave from the High Court, placing their appeal rights on par with accused persons' conviction appeal rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Dec-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA-AS/166/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Punjab and Haryana High Court redirected an appeal against acquittal by complainant Raghubir Singh to the Sessions Court for disposal under Section 372 of the CrPC, following the Supreme Court's landmark ruling in *M/s. Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran*. The court held that victims/complainants in private complaint cases have an unconditional right to appeal acquittals before the Sessions Court, without requiring special leave from the High Court, placing their appeal rights on par with accused persons' conviction appeal rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case