HARRYPAL SINGH ALIAS HARRY AND OTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/4331/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010124312026

Filing Number

CRM-M/2918/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/4331/2026

Registration Date

23-Jan-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARRYPAL SINGH ALIAS HARRY AND OTHERS

    Adv. KARANDEEP SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana quashed FIR No.127 (dated 10.06.2025) against Harrypal Singh and others under BNS 2023 sections 115(2), 126(2), 191(3), 190, and 351(2), finding that the parties had voluntarily settled their dispute through a genuine compromise deed dated 01.12.2025. The court, following Supreme Court precedent, held that continuing criminal proceedings served no useful purpose once the underlying accident-related dispute was resolved and the magistrate confirmed the compromise was made without coercion. The petitioners were required to deposit Rs.10,000 as costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/4331/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana quashed FIR No.127 (dated 10.06.2025) against Harrypal Singh and others under BNS 2023 sections 115(2), 126(2), 191(3), 190, and 351(2), finding that the parties had voluntarily settled their dispute through a genuine compromise deed dated 01.12.2025. The court, following Supreme Court precedent, held that continuing criminal proceedings served no useful purpose once the underlying accident-related dispute was resolved and the magistrate confirmed the compromise was made without coercion. The petitioners were required to deposit Rs.10,000 as costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case