THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD vs MANJU SINGAL AND ORS — FAO/1518/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 173. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010120142025

Filing Number

FAO/4508/2025

Filing Date

22-Jan-2025

Registration No

FAO/1518/2025

Registration Date

05-Mar-2025

Judge

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Coram

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Category

500.4 - ORIENTAL INSURANCE ( 905 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD

    Adv. PUNIT JAIN

  2. 2.THE ORINEAL INSU CO LTD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANJU SINGAL AND ORS

  2. 2.THE ORINEAL INSU CO LTD

  3. 3.KANHIYA LAL SINGAL

  4. 4.KAMYA SINGAL

  5. 5.SHANKAR LAL

  6. 6.GM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Sudeepti SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: FAO 1518/2025 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Oriental Insurance Company's appeal challenging a motor accident compensation award of Rs. 1,17,05,643 for the death of 26-year-old Neha Singal, finding the tribunal correctly assessed her monthly income at Rs. 56,498 (after tax deduction) and properly applied the 1/3 deduction for personal expenses. The court allowed the claimants' cross-objection, marginally enhancing compensation to Rs. 1,17,25,363 with 9% interest, rejecting the insurer's argument that the income was overstated and the personal expense deduction should be 1/2 instead of 1/3. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/1518/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FAO 1518/2025 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Oriental Insurance Company's appeal challenging a motor accident compensation award of Rs. 1,17,05,643 for the death of 26-year-old Neha Singal, finding the tribunal correctly assessed her monthly income at Rs. 56,498 (after tax deduction) and properly applied the 1/3 deduction for personal expenses. The court allowed the claimants' cross-objection, marginally enhancing compensation to Rs. 1,17,25,363 with 9% interest, rejecting the insurer's argument that the income was overstated and the personal expense deduction should be 1/2 instead of 1/3. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case