UGGAR SINGH AND ORS. S.S. MAJITHIA vs STATE OF PB. — CRA-S/1077/2007

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 25-May-2007

CNR: PHHC010106342007

Filing Number

CRA-S/1077/2007

Filing Date

24-May-2007

Registration No

CRA-S/1077/2007

Registration Date

24-May-2007

Judge

Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat

Coram

Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat

Bench Type

Single

Category

36.77 - CRL APPL AGNST CONV GEN MORE THAN 3 UPTO 5 YEARS ( 600 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UGGAR SINGH AND ORS. S.S. MAJITHIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PB.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice N.S. ShekhawatView PDF

    Summary of CRA-S/1077/2007 The Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the trial court's conviction of Uggar Singh and others for rioting and causing grievous hurt under IPC Sections 148, 326, 325, and 323. The court found sufficient evidence through 13 prosecution witnesses, including medical records and victim testimony, proving the appellants attacked two brothers with weapons, causing fractures and injuries. However, the court reduced sentences to time already served, considering the 25-year legal proceedings, amicable settlement between parties, and appellants' good conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-May-2007

    —

    Ms. Justice Navita Singh

  4. 24-May-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA-S/1077/2007

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRA-S/1077/2007 The Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the trial court's conviction of Uggar Singh and others for rioting and causing grievous hurt under IPC Sections 148, 326, 325, and 323. The court found sufficient evidence through 13 prosecution witnesses, including medical records and victim testimony, proving the appellants attacked two brothers with weapons, causing fractures and injuries. However, the court reduced sentences to time already served, considering the 25-year legal proceedings, amicable settlement between parties, and appellants' good conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case