VISHAL SINGH ALIAS SHALI vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/3825/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 07-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010105562026

Filing Number

CRM-M/1991/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/3825/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Coram

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Bench Type

Single

Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHAL SINGH ALIAS SHALI

    Adv. AVTAR SINGH KHINDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Rupinderjit ChahalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-3825/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Vishal Singh alias Shali, who had been in custody for over seven months on charges of criminal intimidation and attempt to cause grievous injury. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal allowed the petition, noting that the petitioner is a first-time offender with clean antecedents, investigation is complete with charges framed, yet no prosecution witnesses have been examined and trial will take considerable time—rendering continued detention violative of Article 21 rights. The court held that indefinite pre-trial detention without prospect of timely trial conclusion violates the constitutional principle that "bail is a rule, jail is an exception." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/3825/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-3825/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Vishal Singh alias Shali, who had been in custody for over seven months on charges of criminal intimidation and attempt to cause grievous injury. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal allowed the petition, noting that the petitioner is a first-time offender with clean antecedents, investigation is complete with charges framed, yet no prosecution witnesses have been examined and trial will take considerable time—rendering continued detention violative of Article 21 rights. The court held that indefinite pre-trial detention without prospect of timely trial conclusion violates the constitutional principle that "bail is a rule, jail is an exception." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case