RAJU vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/4027/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010105472026
Filing Number
CRM-M/1987/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/4027/2026
Registration Date
22-Jan-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla
Coram
Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJU
Adv. BALRAM PRASHAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mr. Justice Subhas MehlaView PDF
The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to petitioner Raju and co-petitioner Ankit Sharma in a case involving alleged trespass, armed assault, and property damage. Justice Subhas Mehla found merit in the bail pleas based on: simple nature of injuries sustained, completed investigation, clean antecedents of Ankit Sharma, extended custody of over six months, and lengthy trial duration. The court ordered their release on furnishing requisite bonds, applying the principle that bail is a rule and jail an exception. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/4027/2026
The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to petitioner Raju and co-petitioner Ankit Sharma in a case involving alleged trespass, armed assault, and property damage. Justice Subhas Mehla found merit in the bail pleas based on: simple nature of injuries sustained, completed investigation, clean antecedents of Ankit Sharma, extended custody of over six months, and lengthy trial duration. The court ordered their release on furnishing requisite bonds, applying the principle that bail is a rule and jail an exception. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts