POOJA BANSAL vs SMT. HANSIRA AND OTHERS — CR/6305/2018

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 19-Sep-2018

CNR: PHHC010102222018

Filing Number

CR/6305/2018

Filing Date

18-Sep-2018

Registration No

CR/6305/2018

Registration Date

18-Sep-2018

Judge

Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja

Coram

Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

30.15 - LAND ACQUISITION ACT ( 509 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.POOJA BANSAL

    Adv. PARVEEN KAUSHIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. HANSIRA AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harkesh ManujaView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Pooja Bansal's civil revision petition as infructuous, finding that the underlying land acquisition reference under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 had already been decided by the Reference Court on December 23, 2025. No substantive order was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Nov-2018

    —

    Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi

  4. 12-Oct-2018

    Mr. Justice B.S. Walia

  5. 12-Oct-2018

    —

    Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi

  6. 05-Oct-2018

    —

    Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi

  7. 27-Sep-2018

    Mr. Justice B.S. Walia

  8. 27-Sep-2018

    —

    Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi

  9. 19-Sep-2018

    Mr. Justice B.S. Walia

  10. 19-Sep-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 18-Sep-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/6305/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Pooja Bansal's civil revision petition as infructuous, finding that the underlying land acquisition reference under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 had already been decided by the Reference Court on December 23, 2025. No substantive order was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case