FAIZAAN AND OTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRM-M/5564/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010101022026

Filing Number

CRM-M/1737/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/5564/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FAIZAAN AND OTHERS

    Adv. DIVYA SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/5564/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petition filed by Faizaan and others to quash FIR No. 134 (dated 27.06.2023) registered under IPC Sections 323, 341, 379, 427, 451, 506, 148, 149 at Police Station Tibba, Ludhiana, after the parties reached a voluntary compromise on 29.05.2025 regarding an original neighborly dispute. The Magistrate's report confirmed the compromise was effected voluntarily without coercion, and the court found no useful purpose in continuing trial proceedings, thereby quashing the FIR and all consequential proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/5564/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/5564/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petition filed by Faizaan and others to quash FIR No. 134 (dated 27.06.2023) registered under IPC Sections 323, 341, 379, 427, 451, 506, 148, 149 at Police Station Tibba, Ludhiana, after the parties reached a voluntary compromise on 29.05.2025 regarding an original neighborly dispute. The Magistrate's report confirmed the compromise was effected voluntarily without coercion, and the court found no useful purpose in continuing trial proceedings, thereby quashing the FIR and all consequential proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case