RISHALA @ RICHHPAL vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/3493/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010100612026

Filing Number

CRM-M/1714/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/3493/2026

Registration Date

20-Jan-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Bench Type

Single

Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RISHALA @ RICHHPAL

    Adv. AMIT CHOUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M No. 3493/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to petitioner Rishala @ Richhpal in a narcotic drugs case. The petitioner was implicated solely based on a co-accused's disclosure statement for alleged poppy husk smuggling, but was not present at the recovery site. The court held that co-accused disclosure statements are inadmissible against other accused persons and that the petitioner's ten-month detention with completed investigation warranted release on bail, subject to standard conditions including personal/surety bonds and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/3493/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M No. 3493/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to petitioner Rishala @ Richhpal in a narcotic drugs case. The petitioner was implicated solely based on a co-accused's disclosure statement for alleged poppy husk smuggling, but was not present at the recovery site. The court held that co-accused disclosure statements are inadmissible against other accused persons and that the petitioner's ten-month detention with completed investigation warranted release on bail, subject to standard conditions including personal/surety bonds and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case