DALVIR SINGH ALIAS SONI vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/3972/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010099312026
Filing Number
CRM-M/1647/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/3972/2026
Registration Date
22-Jan-2026
Judge
Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra
Coram
Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DALVIR SINGH ALIAS SONI
Adv. BALJEET SINGH KATHURIA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF
Case Summary: CRM-M/3972/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Dalvir Singh (alias Soni) in his fourth petition for an NDPS Act case involving 262 grams of Tramadol Hydrochloride. Justice Manisha Batra held that prolonged incarceration of over 2 years and 4 months, combined with no trial progress (no prosecution witnesses examined), constitutes grounds for bail despite Section 37 NDPS restrictions, as it violates Article 21 constitutional protections. Key Reasoning: The court found that delay in trial and extended detention constitute a fresh circumstance justifying bail, even in drug offences, citing Supreme Court precedents establishing that Section 436-A CrPC applies to NDPS cases and constitutional rights override statutory embargoes when incarceration becomes unjustifiably prolonged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/3972/2026
Case Summary: CRM-M/3972/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Dalvir Singh (alias Soni) in his fourth petition for an NDPS Act case involving 262 grams of Tramadol Hydrochloride. Justice Manisha Batra held that prolonged incarceration of over 2 years and 4 months, combined with no trial progress (no prosecution witnesses examined), constitutes grounds for bail despite Section 37 NDPS restrictions, as it violates Article 21 constitutional protections. Key Reasoning: The court found that delay in trial and extended detention constitute a fresh circumstance justifying bail, even in drug offences, citing Supreme Court precedents establishing that Section 436-A CrPC applies to NDPS cases and constitutional rights override statutory embargoes when incarceration becomes unjustifiably prolonged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts