BHAGIRATHSINH ALIAS BHAGIRATHSIN KIRTISINH CHAVADA vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/3802/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010099212026
Filing Number
CRM-M/1614/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/3802/2026
Registration Date
21-Jan-2026
Judge
Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal
Coram
Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal
Bench Type
Single
Category
40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHAGIRATHSINH ALIAS BHAGIRATHSIN KIRTISINH CHAVADA
Adv. PRATHAM SETHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
Ms. Justice Rupinderjit ChahalView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted bail to petitioner Bhagirathsinh Chavada in a case involving alleged abduction and impersonation as police officials. The court found that the petitioner had been in custody for over 6 months, the investigation was complete, charges were framed, but no trial witnesses had been examined yet. Relying on Article 21 constitutional protections and the right to speedy trial principle, the court held that further detention without prospect of near-future trial conclusion would be unconstitutional and released him on bail bonds/surety, clarifying this order expressed no opinion on case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/3802/2026
Summary: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted bail to petitioner Bhagirathsinh Chavada in a case involving alleged abduction and impersonation as police officials. The court found that the petitioner had been in custody for over 6 months, the investigation was complete, charges were framed, but no trial witnesses had been examined yet. Relying on Article 21 constitutional protections and the right to speedy trial principle, the court held that further detention without prospect of near-future trial conclusion would be unconstitutional and released him on bail bonds/surety, clarifying this order expressed no opinion on case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts