AMIT KUMAR vs RAVINDER AND OTHERS — FAO/1210/2019

Case under No Acts Defined Section 1. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010099212019

Filing Number

FAO/5541/2019

Filing Date

21-Jan-2019

Registration No

FAO/1210/2019

Registration Date

11-Feb-2019

Judge

Mr. Justice Yashvir Singh Rathor

Coram

Mr. Justice Yashvir Singh Rathor

Bench Type

Single

Category

20.34 - SENIORITY DISPUTE OF EMPLOYEES OF SCO AND SB UOI ( 465 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMIT KUMAR

    Adv. RAM DARSHAN YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAVINDER AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Yashvir Singh RathorView PDF

    Case Summary: FAO No.1210/2019 (Amit Kumar v. Ravinder and Others) The High Court of Punjab and Haryana partially allowed Amit Kumar's appeal for enhanced compensation in a motor vehicle accident case, increasing the total award from Rs.5,87,690/- to Rs.20,26,400/-, representing an additional Rs.14,39,000/-. The court found the original tribunal's compensation assessment for loss of future income due to 65% permanent disability grossly inadequate and recalculated it using proper multipliers under settled legal principles, while also holding the insurance company liable despite the tribunal's erroneous finding of policy breach regarding commercial use of the tractor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Jan-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/1210/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FAO No.1210/2019 (Amit Kumar v. Ravinder and Others) The High Court of Punjab and Haryana partially allowed Amit Kumar's appeal for enhanced compensation in a motor vehicle accident case, increasing the total award from Rs.5,87,690/- to Rs.20,26,400/-, representing an additional Rs.14,39,000/-. The court found the original tribunal's compensation assessment for loss of future income due to 65% permanent disability grossly inadequate and recalculated it using proper multipliers under settled legal principles, while also holding the insurance company liable despite the tribunal's erroneous finding of policy breach regarding commercial use of the tractor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case