JAGMEET SINGH DHALIWAL vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/3611/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010099122026

Filing Number

CRM-M/1613/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/3611/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGMEET SINGH DHALIWAL

    Adv. Inderjeet Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vinod S. BhardwajView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana quashed FIR No. 223 (dated 09.12.2025) against Jagmeet Singh Dhaliwal for allegedly firing gunshots that damaged complainant Ashwani Kumar's shop near Classic Hotel, Sangrur. The court found the parties had genuinely settled their dispute through compromise dated 13.01.2026, with both parties and the state supporting quashing. Applying Supreme Court precedent, the court held that while the offences (under BNS 2023 and Arms Act) were non-compoundable, quashing was justified as the dispute was personal, did not affect public peace, conviction was unlikely, and continuation would waste judicial resources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/3611/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana quashed FIR No. 223 (dated 09.12.2025) against Jagmeet Singh Dhaliwal for allegedly firing gunshots that damaged complainant Ashwani Kumar's shop near Classic Hotel, Sangrur. The court found the parties had genuinely settled their dispute through compromise dated 13.01.2026, with both parties and the state supporting quashing. Applying Supreme Court precedent, the court held that while the offences (under BNS 2023 and Arms Act) were non-compoundable, quashing was justified as the dispute was personal, did not affect public peace, conviction was unlikely, and continuation would waste judicial resources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case