MUKHTAR SINGH vs CHANCHAL SINGH — CR/898/2023

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010098652023

Filing Number

CR/3713/2023

Filing Date

23-Jan-2023

Registration No

CR/898/2023

Registration Date

07-Feb-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikas Bahl

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikas Bahl

Bench Type

Single

Category

30.1 - CIVIL REVISION(I.O. AND OTHERS) ( 504 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUKHTAR SINGH

    Adv. HARMINDER SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHANCHAL SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikas BahlView PDF

    Case Summary: CR/898/2023 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana partly allowed Mukhtiar Singh's revision petition, setting aside the trial court's dismissal of his application to set aside ex-parte proceedings. The court found that Singh was improperly served and did not negligently delay his response, particularly after discovering the parallel suit against his brother. The court permitted Singh to rejoin the proceedings upon depositing ₹25,000 as cost to the respondent and filing a written statement by 30.03.2026, while directing the trial court to expeditiously frame issues and proceed with cross-examination of plaintiff's witnesses without unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/898/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR/898/2023 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana partly allowed Mukhtiar Singh's revision petition, setting aside the trial court's dismissal of his application to set aside ex-parte proceedings. The court found that Singh was improperly served and did not negligently delay his response, particularly after discovering the parallel suit against his brother. The court permitted Singh to rejoin the proceedings upon depositing ₹25,000 as cost to the respondent and filing a written statement by 30.03.2026, while directing the trial court to expeditiously frame issues and proceed with cross-examination of plaintiff's witnesses without unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case