SUMIT JAIN AND OTHERS vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — CWP-PIL/52/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010091552026

e-Filing Number

18-01-2026

Filing Number

CWP-PIL/816/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

CWP-PIL/52/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Judge

The Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Sanjiv Berry

Coram

The Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Sanjiv Berry

Bench Type

Double

Category

13.4 - PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION ( 414 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Railways Act Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUMIT JAIN AND OTHERS

    Adv. IMRAN FAROOQI

  2. 2.Union of India and others

  3. 3.General Manager

  4. 4.Divisional Railway Manager (DRM)

  5. 5.Shyam Dev Yadav

  6. 6.Deputy Commissioner

  7. 7.Dharamvir

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Union of India and others

  3. 3.General Manager

  4. 4.Divisional Railway Manager (DRM)

  5. 5.Shyam Dev Yadav

  6. 6.Deputy Commissioner

  7. 7.Dharamvir

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    The Chief Justice,mr. Justice Sanjiv BerryView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the civil writ petition filed by Sumit Jain and others against the Union of India as withdrawn, after the petitioners' counsel sought withdrawal at the outset of proceedings on 24.03.2026. The court granted the withdrawal request without addressing the substantive merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP-PIL/52/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the civil writ petition filed by Sumit Jain and others against the Union of India as withdrawn, after the petitioners' counsel sought withdrawal at the outset of proceedings on 24.03.2026. The court granted the withdrawal request without addressing the substantive merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case