PAWAN KUMAR THR LR AND ORS. vs GRAM PANCHAYAT AND ORS. — CR/5222/2018

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

CNR: PHHC010090392018

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

14th August 2018

Filing Number

CR/5222/2018

Filing Date

10-08-2018

Registration No

CR/5222/2018

Registration Date

10-08-2018

Judge

MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN

Coram

MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN

Bench Type

Single

Category

30.2 - CIVIL REVISION(RENT) ( 514 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

13th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

PAWAN KUMAR THR LR AND ORS.

Adv. VIVEK AGGARWAL

Respondent(s)

GRAM PANCHAYAT AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN

14-08-2018
04-12-2018
27-11-2018
20-11-2018
23-10-2018

Orders

14-08-2018

MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI

25-09-2018

MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI

16-10-2018

MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI

23-10-2018

MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI

20-11-2018

MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI

27-11-2018

MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL

04-12-2018

MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI

06-10-2018

MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI

13-05-2026
MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the revision petition filed by Pawan Kumar's legal representatives challenging the Executing Court's order dismissing their objections to possession warrants. The Court found the petition infructuous and dismissed it for non-prosecution, noting the respondent/decree-holder had already obtained possession and the execution petition was satisfied as of July 27, 2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the revision petition filed by Pawan Kumar's legal representatives challenging the Executing Court's order dismissing their objections to possession warrants. The Court found the petition infructuous and dismissed it for non-prosecution, noting the respondent/decree-holder had already obtained possession and the execution petition was satisfied as of July 27, 2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case