VIRENDER SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Advocate - A.G. HARYANA — CWP/1692/2022

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-Feb-2022

CNR: PHHC010089622022

Filing Number

CWP/3567/2022

Filing Date

27-Jan-2022

Registration No

CWP/1692/2022

Registration Date

31-Jan-2022

Judge

Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya

Coram

Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya

Bench Type

Single

Category

58.14 - SERVICE-EDU-HARYANA(TECH/NON TECH DEPTS. ( 709 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIRENDER SINGH

    Adv. KARAN SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Advocate - A.G. HARYANA

  2. 2.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETRAY TO GOVT OF HARYANA

  3. 3.VICE CHAIRMAN BOARD OF GOVERNOR

  4. 4.DIRECTOR GENERAL, TECHNICAL EDUCATION DEPT

  5. 5.PRINCIPAL RANI JHANSI LAXMI BAI GOVT POLYTECHNIC EDUCATION SOCIETY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Tribhuvan DahiyaView PDF

    The petition seeking a mandamus to promote Virender Singh to the position of Head of Department (HoD) in Computer Science and Engineering was rendered infructuous after the State granted the promotion on 05.03.2026, prior to the court's decision on 15.05.2026. The court disposed of the petition as infructuous, noting that the relief sought had already been granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Feb-2022

    Other

  4. 27-Jan-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/1692/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The petition seeking a mandamus to promote Virender Singh to the position of Head of Department (HoD) in Computer Science and Engineering was rendered infructuous after the State granted the promotion on 05.03.2026, prior to the court's decision on 15.05.2026. The court disposed of the petition as infructuous, noting that the relief sought had already been granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case